Difficult‐to‐treat asthma patients from ethnic minority groups in central England are at an enhanced risk of house dust mite sensitisation

BACKGROUND: House dust mite (HDM) is the most common sensitising allergen in asthma.

Ethnic minority groups (EMGs) in the UK are more likely to live in deprived conditionings with a greater exposure to HDM and other aero‐allergens.

AIM: To compare the ethnicity‐based patterns of sensitisation to aero‐allergens and the impact of ethnicity on clinical outcomes in patients with difficult‐to‐treat asthma (DTA).

METHODS: Data of patients with DTA were extracted from the registry of the Birmingham Regional Severe Asthma Service (BRSAS), which have a catchment population of 7.3million from Central England.

Patients from White and EMG backgrounds were compared in terms of the prevalence of atopy, total serum immunoglobulin E (IgE), specific serum IgE (ssIgE) and asthma related clinical outcomes.

Logistic regression analysis was conducted to explore ethnicity‐based risk factors for HDM sensitisation.

RESULTS: A total of 1272 patients [White 1016 (79.9%), EMG 256 (20.1%) EMG] with a median age of 51 years (range 16–97) were included in the analysis.

Patients from EMG were more likely (64%) to reside in the worst scale of index of multiple deprivation (IMD) than the White patients (25.5%), p < 0.0001.

Positive HDM sensitisation was more prevalent in the EMG than in the White group [142/216 (66%) versus 375/842 (45%), p < 0.0001].

The median HDM ssIgE level was higher in the EMG than in the White group [3.0 KUA/L (IQR 0.06, 11.5) versus 0.1 (0.01, 3.0), p < 0.000001].

The odds ratio for positive sensitisation to HDM conveyed by the EMG status was 2.61 (95%CI, 1.8–3.8), p < 0.0001.

Compared to the White group, the EMG had higher median total serum IgE [326 KU/L (115, 971) versus 114 (29.8, 434.8), p < 0.000001], higher blood eosinophil count (0.36 × 10(9)(0.18, 0.62) versus 0.23 (0.1,0.47), p < 0.000001), were marginally more atopic (79.2% vs. 75.6%, p = 0.098) and were less likely to being on maintenance oral corticosteroids (22% vs. 39.7%, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION: In this DTA cohort, positive HDM sensitisation was greater amongst the EMG than the White patients.

The EMG status was a significant risk factor for HDM sensitisation.