Treatment and survival of Norwegian cattle after uterine prolapse

Background Bovine uterine prolapse is a sporadic but life-threatening postpartum condition.

The aims of this study were; (i) to determine which clinical findings determined the likelihood of treatment vs. culling, (ii) to identify the treatment methods currently employed by Norwegian veterinary surgeons and evaluate their effect on survival, (iii) to determine if clinical findings at the time of treatment could be used to determine prognosis.

Practicing veterinary surgeons in Norway were contacted and asked to fill out a questionnaire on cases of bovine uterine prolapse they attended between February and October 2012.

The questionnaires gathered data on signalment, clinical presentation, treatment, and outcome.

These data were supplemented with culling data from the Norwegian Dairy and Beef Herd Recording Systems.

The chi-squared test and logistic regression modelling was performed to identify likelihood of treatment and cox proportional hazard modelling was performed to identify the hazard of death after treatment.

Results Data from 126 cases of bovine uterine prolapse were collected (78 beef and 48 dairy cows).

Twenty-six cows (21%) were emergency slaughtered, or underwent euthanasia, without treatment.

Of the remaining 100 cases amputation of the uterus was performed once and repositioning was performed in 99 cases.

Survival data were missing from 2 of the cases that had undergone treatment leaving a study sample of 97 cases (64 beef and 33 dairy cows).

Multivariable logistic regression analysis of the explanatory variables showed that beef cows were more likely to be treated than dairy cows (OR = 0.32, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.81, P = 0.017) and that cows with a significantly oedematous or traumatised uterus were less likely to be treated (OR = 0.26, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.67, P = 0.006).

Treatment methods amongst Norwegian practitioners were broadly similar.

In a multivariable model cows general clinical state at time of treatment was positively correlated with survival (HR = 0.29, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.73, P = 0.008) and a history of a vaginal prolapse prepartum increased the hazard of death (HR = 2.31, 95% CI 1.08 to 4.95, P = 0.031) in the first 30 days after treatment of a uterine prolapse.

In the first 180 days after treatment only veterinary assessment of a cows’ general clinical state was correlated with hazard of death (HR = 0.432, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.91, P = 0.046).

Conclusions This study shows that the production system and extent of uterine damage affect the likelihood of treatment, and that practitioners use similar treatment methods.

A cows’ general clinical state at time of treatment was positively correlated with survival, and a history of a vaginal prolapse prepartum increased the hazard of death in the first 30 days after treatment of a uterine prolapse.