Surgical outcomes of endoscopic enucleation of the prostate in community aging males with or without preoperative urinary retention

Objectives This study aims to investigate the surgical outcomes of endoscopic enucleation of the prostate in older males with or without preoperative urinary retention (UR).

Material and methods We conducted a study on selected patients with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) who underwent either thulium:YAG laser (vela XL) prostate enucleation (ThuLEP) or bipolar plasma enucleation of the prostate (B-TUEP) at the geriatric urology department of our institution.

The studied patients were categorized into two groups, namely the UR group and the non-UR group, on the basis of whether they experienced UR in the 1 month preceding their surgery.

Their clinical outcomes following prostate endoscopic surgery were evaluated and analyzed.

Results Our results revealed comparable outcomes for operation time, length of hospital stay, percentage of tissue removed, re-catheterization rate, and urinary tract infection rate within the 1 month between the B-TUEP and ThuLEP surgery groups, regardless of UR history.

However, the non-UR B-TUEP group experienced more blood loss relative to the non-UR ThuLEP group ( P  = .004).

Notably, patients with UR exhibited significantly greater changes in IPSS total, IPSS voiding, and prostate-specific antigen values relative to those without UR.

Conclusions Both ThuLEP and B-TUEP were effective in treating BPH-related bladder outlet obstruction.

Our study identified more pronounced changes in IPSS total, IPSS voiding, and prostate-specific antigens within the UR group.

Moreover, the rate of postoperative UR in this group was not higher than that observed in the non-UR group.

Our study also revealed that the presumed benefits of laser surgery in reducing blood loss were less pronounced for patients with UR.