What Kinds of Dogs Are Used in Clinical and Experimental Research?

SIMPLE SUMMARY: The objective of this study was to evaluate the signalment of dogs used in veterinary research in six different specialties.

In total, 150 randomly chosen clinical studies (25 studies per specialty) published between 2007 and 2019 were evaluated for the breed, sex, neuter status, age, and weight information of the dogs used.

Breed information was given for 5.7% of the included animals.

Beagles were used 1.9% of the time, which was a less significant role in research than we expected.

Information about the sex of the dogs was lacking for 16.2% of the included animals, while age and weight information were missing for 22.7 and 32.7%, respectively.

The neuter status was not given in 38.7% of the clinical studies.

The results show deficits in the reporting of demographic data for the dogs.

The need for an improvement in the documentation and/or reporting of animal signalment is obvious and should be addressed by authors, reviewers, and journal editors in the future.

ABSTRACT: Background: Dogs are widely used in research to answer questions about canine or human conditions.

For the latter, research dogs are often used as models, since they are physiologically more similar to humans than other species used in research and they share similar environmental conditions.

From a veterinary perspective, research findings are widely based on academic research, and thus are generated under experimental conditions.

In that regard, the question arises: do the dogs used for research adequately represent the dog population seen in veterinary practice?

It may, for example, be assumed that Beagle dogs are often used as experimental animals.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the signalment of dogs used in veterinary research.

Furthermore, we aimed to assess other relevant criteria regarding the validity of clinical trials in the context of six different veterinary medicine specialties: cardiology, internal medicine, neurology, orthopaedics, reproduction, and surgery.

Methods: A literature search was conducted and 25 studies per specialty were randomly selected.

The breed, sex, neuter status, median age, and median weight of the dogs used for clinical studies (n = 150) published between 2007 and 2019 were evaluated.

Results: In total, 596,542 dogs were used in the 150 trials.

Breed information was given for 33,835 of these dogs (5.7%).

Of the latter, 1.9% were Beagles.

Nine clinical trials exclusively used Beagles.

The most frequently used breeds were German Shepherds (7.3%), Labrador Retrievers (6.7%), and Golden Retrievers (4.7%).

The major reporting deficits found were missing breed specification in 25.3% of the articles; missing information about the sex of the dogs in 16.2%; missing age and weight information in 22.7 and 32.7%, respectively; and missing neuter status in 38.7% of the clinical studies.

The median sample size was 56 (Q1:29; Q3:365) dogs.

Conclusions: The presented project revealed that Beagle dogs represent only a small proportion of dogs in veterinary research.

Based on the evaluated publications, it seems that some relevant dog attributes differ between the specialties.

The results, however, show deficits in the reporting of demographic data for the dogs.

The need for an improvement in the documentation and/or reporting of animal signalment is obvious and should be addressed by authors, reviewers, and journal editors in the future.