Document detail
ID

oai:HAL:inserm-03192882v1

Topic
[SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio]
Author
Ratone, Jean-Philippe Caillol, Fabrice Zemmour, Christophe Bories, Erwan Pesenti, Christian Godat, Sébastien Hoibian, Solene de Chaisemartin, Cécile Meillat, Hélène Lelong, Bernard Poizat, Flora Giovannini, Marc
Langue
en
Editor

HAL CCSD;Romanian Societies of Gastroenterology

Category

CNRS - Centre national de la recherche scientifique

Year

2020

listing date

12/15/2023

Keywords
performing single-center study months undergo underwent dfs piecemeal surgery ecc pmr endoscopic
Metrics

Abstract

International audience; Background & Aims: The use of endoscopic treatment for early colorectal cancer (ECC) is increasing.

The European guidelines suggest performing piecemeal endoscopic resection (pmR) for benign lesions and en bloc resection for ECC, especially for patients with favorable lymph node involvement risk evaluations.

However, en bloc resections for lesions larger than two centimeters require invasive endoscopic techniques.

Our retrospective single-center study aimed to determine the clinical impact of performing pmR for ECC rather than traditional en bloc resection.

Methods: A single-center study was performed between January 2012 and September 2017.

All ECC patients were included.

The main objective was to evaluate the number of patients who potentially underwent unnecessary surgery due to piecemeal resection.

The secondary endpoints were as follows: disease-free survival (DFS), defined as the time from pmR to endoscopic failure (local recurrence not treatable by endoscopy), complication rate, number of patients who did not undergo surgery by default, and factors predictive of outcomes and complications.

Results: One hundred and forty-six ECC endoscopically treated patients were included.

In total, 85 patients were excluded (71 who underwent en bloc resection, 14 with pending follow-up).

Data from 61 patients (33 women and 28 men) were analyzed.

Two patients underwent potentially unnecessary surgery [3.28% (0.9%-11.2%)].

The DFS rate was 87% (75%-93%) at 6 months and 85% [72%-92%] at 12 months.

The median followup time was 16.5 months (12.4-20.9).

Three patients (4.9%) had complications.

One patient did not undergo surgery by default.

A Paris classification of 0-2c (HR=9.3 (2.4-35.9), p<0.001) and Vienna classification of 5 [HR=16.3 (3.3-80.4), p<0.001] were factors associated with poor DFS.

Conclusion: Performing pmR in place of en bloc resection for ECC had a limited impact on patients.

If the pathology (especially deep margins) is analyzable, careful monitoring could be acceptable in ECC patients who undergo pmR.

Ratone, Jean-Philippe,Caillol, Fabrice,Zemmour, Christophe,Bories, Erwan,Pesenti, Christian,Godat, Sébastien,Hoibian, Solene,de Chaisemartin, Cécile,Meillat, Hélène,Lelong, Bernard,Poizat, Flora,Giovannini, Marc, 2020, Is Piecemeal Endoscopic Resection Acceptable for Early Colorectal Cancers in Certain Situations? A Single-Center French Study, HAL CCSD;Romanian Societies of Gastroenterology

Document

Open

Share

Source

Articles recommended by ES/IODE AI