Document detail
ID

oai:arXiv.org:2411.04740

Topic
Computer Science - Software Engine...
Author
Wang, Xinyi Ali, Shaukat Arcaini, Paolo Veeraragavan, Narasimha Raghavan Nygård, Jan F.
Category

Computer Science

Year

2024

listing date

11/13/2024

Keywords
software crn model learning machine quantum cancer qnn system
Metrics

Abstract

The Cancer Registry of Norway (CRN) is a part of the Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH) and is tasked with producing statistics on cancer among the Norwegian population.

For this task, CRN develops, tests, and evolves a software system called Cancer Registration Support System (CaReSS).

It is a complex socio-technical software system that interacts with many entities (e.g., hospitals, medical laboratories, and other patient registries) to achieve its task.

For cost-effective testing of CaReSS, CRN has employed EvoMaster, an AI-based REST API testing tool combined with an integrated classical machine learning model.

Within this context, we propose Qlinical to investigate the feasibility of using, inside EvoMaster, a Quantum Neural Network (QNN) classifier, i.e., a quantum machine learning model, instead of the existing classical machine learning model.

Results indicate that Qlinical can achieve performance comparable to that of EvoClass.

We further explore the effects of various QNN configurations on performance and offer recommendations for optimal QNN settings for future QNN developers.

Wang, Xinyi,Ali, Shaukat,Arcaini, Paolo,Veeraragavan, Narasimha Raghavan,Nygård, Jan F., 2024, Quantum Neural Network Classifier for Cancer Registry System Testing: A Feasibility Study

Document

Open

Share

Source

Articles recommended by ES/IODE AI

Enhancing Language Model Rationality with Bi-Directional Deliberation Reasoning
potential deliberation information outcomes language contexts historical reasoning
The Lasting impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on outpatient neurology consultations
rates consultations patients neurology outcomes clinic appointments referrals outpatient pandemic
Evaluation of ‘implications for research’ statements in systematic reviews of interventions in advanced cancer patients – a meta-research study
patients advanced cancer bias statement reporting ‘patient design included interventions domains srs cochrane 5% statements intervention elements study