Document detail
ID

oai:www.zora.uzh.ch:206916

Topic
Institute of Veterinary Pathology Department of Small Animals Department of Clinical Diagnostics... Center for Clinical Studies 610 Medicine & health
Author
Klaus, Julia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8814-2860 Zini, Eric https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7580-1297 Hartmann, Katrin Egberink, Herman https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6852-5936 Kipar, Anja https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7289-3459 Bergmann, Michèle Palizzotto, Carlo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2752-2613 Zhao, Shan Rossi, Francesco Franco, Vittoria Porporato, Federico Hofmann-Lehmann, Regina https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9750-4296 Meli, Marina L https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3609-2416
Langue
eng
Editor

MDPI Publishing

Category

Subjects = 05 Vetsuisse Faculty: Center for Clinical Studies

Year

2021

listing date

10/11/2023

Keywords
pandemic oropharyngeal 1% positive rna ci swab 95% dog dogs infection veterinary 0
Metrics

Abstract

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has affected millions of people globally since its first detection in late 2019.

Besides humans, cats and, to some extent, dogs were shown to be susceptible to SARS-CoV-2, highlighting the need for surveillance in a One Health context.

Seven veterinary clinics from regions with high incidences of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) were recruited during the early pandemic (March to July 2020) for the screening of patients.

A total of 2257 oropharyngeal and nasal swab specimen from 877 dogs and 260 cats (including 18 animals from COVID-19-affected households and 92 animals with signs of respiratory disease) were analyzed for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA using reverse transcriptase real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) targeting the viral envelope (E) and RNA dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) genes.

One oropharyngeal swab from an Italian cat, living in a COVID-19-affected household in Piedmont, tested positive in RT-qPCR (1/260; 0.38%, 95% CI: 0.01-2.1%), and SARS-CoV-2 infection of the animal was serologically confirmed six months later.

One oropharyngeal swab from a dog was potentially positive (1/877; 0.1%, 95% CI: 0.002-0.63%), but the result was not confirmed in a reference laboratory.

Analyses of convenience sera from 118 animals identified one dog (1/94; 1.1%; 95% CI: 0.02-5.7%) from Lombardy, but no cats (0/24), as positive for anti-SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain (RBD) antibodies and neutralizing activity.

These findings support the hypothesis that the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in pet cat and dog populations, and hence, the risk of zoonotic transmission to veterinary staff, was low during the first wave of the pandemic, even in hotspot areas.

Klaus, Julia, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8814-2860,Zini, Eric, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7580-1297,Hartmann, Katrin,Egberink, Herman, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6852-5936,Kipar, Anja, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7289-3459,Bergmann, Michèle,Palizzotto, Carlo, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2752-2613,Zhao, Shan,Rossi, Francesco,Franco, Vittoria,Porporato, Federico,Hofmann-Lehmann, Regina, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9750-4296,Meli, Marina L, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3609-2416, 2021, SARS-CoV-2 Infection in dogs and cats from Southern Germany and Northern Italy during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, MDPI Publishing

Document

Open

Share

Source

Articles recommended by ES/IODE AI

Should we consider Systemic Inflammatory Response Index (SIRI) as a new diagnostic marker for rectal cancer?
inflammation rectal surgery overall survival complication significantly diagnostic value cancer rectal 38 siri