Document detail
ID

doi:10.1007/s12149-023-01874-5...

Author
Michalski, Kerstin Kosmala, Aleksander Werner, Rudolf A. Serfling, Sebastian E. Seitz, Anna K. Lapa, Constantin Buck, Andreas K. Hartrampf, Philipp E.
Langue
en
Editor

Springer

Category

Medicine & Public Health

Year

2023

listing date

11/1/2023

Keywords
psma radioligand therapy pet-based eligibility dual tracer imaging vision therap mcrpc therap+ vision− end-stage pet/ct therap− < 0 vision+ 01 vision rlt vs 95% trial hr cancer prostate pfs psma therap os ci
Metrics

Abstract

Background Two randomized clinical trials demonstrated the efficacy of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) radioligand therapy (PSMA RLT) in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

While the VISION trial used criteria within PSMA PET/CT for inclusion, the TheraP trial used dual tracer imaging including FDG PET/CT.

Therefore, we investigated whether the application of the VISION criteria leads to a benefit in overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) for men with mCRPC after PSMA RLT.

Methods Thirty-five men with mCRPC who had received PSMA RLT as a last-line option and who had undergone pretherapeutic imaging with FDG and [^68Ga]Ga-PSMA I&T or [^18F]PSMA-1007 were studied.

Therapeutic eligibility was retrospectively evaluated using the VISION and TheraP study criteria.

Results 26 of 35 (74%) treated patients fulfilled the VISION criteria (= VISION+) and only 17 of 35 (49%) fulfilled the TheraP criteria (= TheraP+).

Significantly reduced OS and PFS after PSMA RLT was observed in patients rated VISION− compared to VISION+ (OS: VISION−: 3 vs. VISION+: 12 months, hazard ratio (HR) 3.1, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0–9.1, p  < 0.01; PFS: VISION−: 1 vs. VISION+: 5 months, HR 2.7, 95% CI 1.0–7.8, p  < 0.01).

For patients rated TheraP−, no significant difference in OS but in PFS was observed compared to TheraP+ patients (OS: TheraP−: 5.5 vs. TheraP+: 11 months, HR 1.6, 95% CI 0.8–3.3, p  = 0.2; PFS: TheraP−: 1 vs. TheraP+: 6 months, HR 2.2, 95% CI 1.0–4.5, p  < 0.01).

Conclusion Retrospective application of the inclusion criteria of the VISION study leads to a benefit in OS and PFS after PSMA RL, whereas TheraP criteria appear to be too strict in patients with end-stage prostate cancer.

Thus, performing PSMA PET/CT including a contrast-enhanced CT as proposed in the VISION trial might be sufficient for treatment eligibility of end-stage prostate cancer patients.

Michalski, Kerstin,Kosmala, Aleksander,Werner, Rudolf A.,Serfling, Sebastian E.,Seitz, Anna K.,Lapa, Constantin,Buck, Andreas K.,Hartrampf, Philipp E., 2023, Comparison of PET/CT-based eligibility according to VISION and TheraP trial criteria in end-stage prostate cancer patients undergoing radioligand therapy, Springer

Document

Open

Share

Source

Articles recommended by ES/IODE AI

Skin cancer prevention behaviors, beliefs, distress, and worry among hispanics in Florida and Puerto Rico
skin cancer hispanic/latino prevention behaviors protection motivation theory florida puerto rico variables rico psychosocial behavior response efficacy levels skin cancer participants prevention behaviors spanish-preferring tampeños puerto hispanics