CHIME-GP trial of online education for prescribing, pathology and imaging ordering in general practice – how did it bring about behaviour change?

Background There is a need for scalable clinician education in rational medication prescribing and rational ordering of pathology and imaging to help improve patient safety and enable more efficient utilisation of healthcare resources.

Our wider study evaluated the effectiveness of a multifaceted education intervention for general practitioners (GPs) in rational prescribing and ordering of pathology and imaging tests, in the context of Australia’s online patient-controlled health record system, My Health Record (MHR), and found evidence for measurable behaviour change in pathology ordering among participants who completed the educational activities.

This current study explored the mechanisms of behaviour change brought about by the intervention, with a view to informing the development of similar interventions in the future.

Methods This mixed methods investigation used self-reported questionnaires at baseline and post-education on MHR use and rational prescribing and test ordering.

These were analysed using multi-level ordinal logistic regression models.

Semi-structured interviews pre- and post-intervention were also conducted and were analysed thematically using the COM-B framework.

Results Of the 106 GPs recruited into the study, 60 completed baseline and 37 completed post-education questionnaires.

Nineteen participants were interviewed at baseline and completion.

Analysis of questionnaires demonstrated a significant increase in confidence using MHR and in self-reported frequency of MHR use, post-education compared with baseline.

There were also similar improvements in confidence across the cohort pre-post education in deprescribing, frequency of review of pathology ordering regimens and evidence-based imaging.

The qualitative findings showed an increase in GPs’ perceived capability with, and the use of MHR, at post-education compared with baseline.

Participants saw the education as an opportunity for learning, for reinforcing what they already knew, and for motivating change of behaviour in increasing their utilisation of MHR, and ordering fewer unnecessary tests and prescriptions.

Conclusions Our education intervention appeared to provide its effects through providing opportunity, increasing capability and enhancing motivation to increase MHR knowledge and usage, as well as rational prescribing and test ordering behaviour.

There were overlapping effects of skills acquisition and confidence across intervention arms, which may have contributed to wider changes in behaviour than the specific topic area addressed in the education.

Trial registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12620000010998) (09/01/2020).