Document detail
ID

doi:10.1186/s12894-023-01319-1...

Author
Wang, Xing Yu, Jiandi Wen, Huali Yan, Junfeng Peng, Kun Zhou, Haiyong
Langue
en
Editor

BioMed Central

Category

Urology

Year

2023

listing date

9/20/2023

Keywords
prostate cancer radiotherapy srxn1 antioxidant stress prognostic marker ssgsea du145 scores irradiation cell x-ray stress pc3 radiotherapy cells cancer srxn1 treatment prostate prad patients 0
Metrics

Abstract

Purpose To explore the mechanisms of radiotherapy resistance and search for prognostic biomarkers for prostate cancer.

Methods The GSE192817 and TCGA PRAD datasets were selected and downloaded from the GEO and UCSC Xena databases.

Differential expression and functional annotation analyses were applied to 52 tumour cell samples from GSE192817.

Then, the ssGSEA or GSVA algorithms were applied to quantitatively score the biological functional activity of samples in the GSE192817 and TCGA PRAD datasets, combined with specific gene sets collected from the Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB).

Subsequently, the Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare the differences in ssGSEA or GSVA scores among cell types or PRAD patients.

Moreover, radiotherapy resistance-associated gene screening was performed on DU145 and PC3 cells (prostate cancer cells), and survival analysis was used to evaluate the efficacy of these genes for predicting the prognosis of PRAD patients.

Results A total of 114 genes that were differentially expressed in more than two different cancer cell types and associated with either sham surgery or radiotherapy treatment (X-ray or photon irradiation) were detected in cancer cells from GSE192817.

Comparison of DNA damage-related ssGSEA scores between sham surgery and radiotherapy treatment in prostate cancer cells (DU145 and PC3) showed that photon irradiation was potentially more effective than X-ray treatment.

In the TCGA PRAD dataset, patients treated with radiotherapy had much higher “GOBP_CELLULAR_RESPONSE_TO_DNA_DAMAGE_STIMULUS”, “GOBP_G2_DNA_DAMAGE_CHECKPOINT” and “GOBP_INTRA_S_DNA_DAMAGE_CHECKPOINT” GSVA scores, and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test p values were 0.0005, 0.0062 and 0.0800, respectively.

Furthermore, SRXN1 was upregulated in DU145 cells (resistant to X-ray irradiation compared to PC3 cells) after radiotherapy treatment, and low SRXN1 expression in patients was beneficial to radiotherapy outcomes.

The log-rank test p value for PFS was 0.0072.

Conclusions Radiotherapy can damage DNA and induce oxidative stress to kill tumour cells.

In this study, we found that SRXN1, as an antioxidative stress gene, plays an important role in radiotherapy for prostate cancer treatment, and this gene is also a potential biomarker for predicting the prognosis of patients treated with radiotherapy.

Wang, Xing,Yu, Jiandi,Wen, Huali,Yan, Junfeng,Peng, Kun,Zhou, Haiyong, 2023, Antioxidative stress protein SRXN1 can be used as a radiotherapy prognostic marker for prostate cancer, BioMed Central

Document

Open

Share

Source

Articles recommended by ES/IODE AI

High-Frequency Repetitive Magnetic Stimulation at the Sacrum Alleviates Chronic Constipation in Parkinson’s Patients
magnetic stimulation parkinson’s significant patients scale sacrum pd hf-rms chronic constipation scores
The mechanism of PFK-1 in the occurrence and development of bladder cancer by regulating ZEB1 lactylation
bladder cancer pfk-1 zeb1 lactylation glycolysis inhibits lactate glucose bc pfk-1 cancer lactylation cells bladder