Document detail
ID

oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:1024...

Topic
Interventional
Author
Hendrix, P. Collins, M.K. Goren, O. Weiner, G.M. Dalal, S.S. Melamed, I. Kole, M.J. Griessenauer, C.J. Noto, A. Schirmer, C.M.
Langue
en
Editor

American Society of Neuroradiology

Category

AJNR: American Journal of Neuroradiology

Year

2023

listing date

6/10/2024

Keywords
patients 2% thrombectomy mechanical stroke versus large-vessel-occlusion femoral complications access-site alteplase tenecteplase
Metrics

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: IV thrombolysis with alteplase before mechanical thrombectomy for emergent large-vessel-occlusion stroke is associated with access-site bleeding complications.

However, the incidence of femoral access-site complications with tenecteplase before mechanical thrombectomy requires exploration.

Here, femoral access-site complications with tenecteplase versus alteplase before mechanical thrombectomy for large-vessel-occlusion stroke were compared.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients receiving IV thrombolytics before mechanical thrombectomy for large-vessel-occlusion stroke who presented from January 2020 to August 2022 were reviewed.

In May 2021, our health care system switched from alteplase to tenecteplase as the primary thrombolytic for all patients with stroke, facilitating the comparison of alteplase-versus-tenecteplase femoral access-site complication rates.

Major (requiring surgery) and minor (managed conservatively) access-site complications were assessed.

RESULTS: One hundred thirty-nine patients underwent transfemoral mechanical thrombectomy for large-vessel-occlusion stroke, of whom 46/139 (33.1%) received tenecteplase and 93/139 (66.9%) received alteplase.

In all cases (n = 139), an 8F sheath was inserted without sonographic guidance, and vascular closure was obtained with an Angio-Seal.

Baseline demographics, concomitant antithrombotic medications, and periprocedural coagulation lab findings were similar between groups.

The incidence of conservatively managed groin hematomas (2.2% versus 4.3%), delayed access-site oozing requiring manual compression (6.5% versus 2.2%), and arterial occlusion requiring surgery (2.2% versus 1.1%) was similar between the tenecteplase and alteplase groups, respectively (P = not significant).

No dissection, arteriovenous fistula, or retroperitoneal hematoma was observed.

CONCLUSIONS: Tenecteplase compared with alteplase before mechanical thrombectomy for large-vessel-occlusion stroke is not associated with an alteration in femoral access-site complication rates.

Hendrix, P.,Collins, M.K.,Goren, O.,Weiner, G.M.,Dalal, S.S.,Melamed, I.,Kole, M.J.,Griessenauer, C.J.,Noto, A.,Schirmer, C.M., 2023, Femoral Access-Site Complications with Tenecteplase versus Alteplase before Mechanical Thrombectomy for Large-Vessel-Occlusion Stroke, American Society of Neuroradiology

Document

Open Open

Share

Source

Articles recommended by ES/IODE AI

Should we consider Systemic Inflammatory Response Index (SIRI) as a new diagnostic marker for rectal cancer?
inflammation rectal surgery overall survival complication significantly diagnostic value cancer rectal 38 siri