Documentdetail
ID kaart

oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:1006...

Onderwerp
Original Article
Auteur
Burghgraef, Thijs A Hol, Jeroen C Rutgers, Marieke L Brown, Gina Hompes, Roel Sietses, Colin Consten, Esther C J
Langue
en
Editor

Oxford University Press

Categorie

BJS Open

Jaar

2023

vermelding datum

30-11-2023

Trefwoorden
cohort 0 included study versus cancer cent rectal patients definition sigmoid
Metriek

Beschrijving

BACKGROUND: The introduction of the sigmoid take-off definition might lead to a shift from rectal cancers to sigmoid cancers.

The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to determine the clinical impact of the new definition.

METHODS: In this multicentre retrospective cohort study, patients were included if they underwent an elective, curative total mesorectal excision for non-metastasized rectal cancer between January 2015 and December 2017, were registered in the Dutch Colorectal Audit as having a rectal cancer according to the previous definition, and if MRI was available.

All selected rectal cancer cases were reassessed using the sigmoid take-off definition.

The primary outcome was the number of patients reassessed with a sigmoid cancer.

Secondary outcomes included differences between the newly defined rectal and sigmoid cancer patients in treatment, perioperative results, and 3-year oncological outcomes (overall and disease-free survivals, and local and systemic recurrences).

RESULTS: Out of 1742 eligible patients, 1302 rectal cancer patients were included.

Of these, 170 (13.1 per cent) were reclassified as having sigmoid cancer.

Among these, 93 patients (54.7 per cent) would have been offered another adjuvant or neoadjuvant treatment according to the Dutch guideline.

Patients with a sigmoid tumour after reassessment had a lower 30-day postoperative complication rate (33.5 versus 48.3 per cent, P < 0.001), lower reintervention rate (8.8 versus 17.4 per cent, P < 0.007), and a shorter length of stay (a median of 5 days (i.q.r. 4–7) versus a median of 6 days (i.q.r. 5–9), P < 0.001).

Three-year oncological outcomes were comparable.

CONCLUSION: Using the anatomical landmark of the sigmoid take-off, 13.1 per cent of the previously classified patients with rectal cancer had sigmoid cancer, and 54.7 per cent of these patients would have been treated differently with regard to neoadjuvant therapy or adjuvant therapy.

Burghgraef, Thijs A,Hol, Jeroen C,Rutgers, Marieke L,Brown, Gina,Hompes, Roel,Sietses, Colin,Consten, Esther C J,, 2023, Implications of the new MRI-based rectum definition according to the sigmoid take-off: multicentre cohort study, Oxford University Press

Delen

Bron

Artikelen aanbevolen door ES/IODE AI

A rare case of localized peliosis hepatis during adjuvant chemotherapy including oxaliplatin mimicking a liver metastasis of colon cancer
peliosis hepatis metastatic liver tumor oxaliplatin oxaliplatin associated cancer metastatic tumor liver hepatis peliosis