Documentdetail
ID kaart

oai:arXiv.org:2410.16765

Onderwerp
Statistics - Machine Learning Computer Science - Artificial Inte... Computer Science - Machine Learnin...
Auteur
Alberge, Julie Maladière, Vincent Grisel, Olivier Abécassis, Judith Varoquaux, Gaël
Categorie

Computer Science

Jaar

2024

vermelding datum

30-10-2024

Trefwoorden
survival
Metriek

Beschrijving

When dealing with right-censored data, where some outcomes are missing due to a limited observation period, survival analysis -- known as time-to-event analysis -- focuses on predicting the time until an event of interest occurs.

Multiple classes of outcomes lead to a classification variant: predicting the most likely event, a less explored area known as competing risks.

Classic competing risks models couple architecture and loss, limiting scalability.To address these issues, we design a strictly proper censoring-adjusted separable scoring rule, allowing optimization on a subset of the data as each observation is evaluated independently.

The loss estimates outcome probabilities and enables stochastic optimization for competing risks, which we use for efficient gradient boosting trees.

SurvivalBoost not only outperforms 12 state-of-the-art models across several metrics on 4 real-life datasets, both in competing risks and survival settings, but also provides great calibration, the ability to predict across any time horizon, and computation times faster than existing methods.

;Comment: arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:2406.14085

Alberge, Julie,Maladière, Vincent,Grisel, Olivier,Abécassis, Judith,Varoquaux, Gaël, 2024, Survival Models: Proper Scoring Rule and Stochastic Optimization with Competing Risks

Document

Openen

Delen

Bron

Artikelen aanbevolen door ES/IODE AI

Assessment of neuropathic pain management knowledge, attitudes, and practices among urology trainees and consultants in prostate cancer care: a survey-based study
neuropathic pain prostate cancer pain assessment who analgesic ladder dn4 questionnaire pain detect questionnaire pain management attitudes patient quality patients life pain prostate study cancer urologists management