Dokumentdetails
ID

doi:10.1007/s11701-023-01523-z...

Autor
O’Brien, Lukas Padraig Hannan, Enda Antao, Brice Peirce, Colin
Langue
en
Editor

Springer

Kategorie

Urology

Jahr

2023

Auflistungsdatum

18.01.2023

Schlüsselwörter
paediatric robotic surgery paediatric surgery robotic surgery minimally invasive surgery particularly surgery
Metrisch

Zusammenfassung

The benefits of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) compared with traditional open surgery, including reduced postoperative pain and a reduced length of stay, are well recognised.

A significant barrier for MIS in paediatric populations has been the technical challenge posed by laparoscopic surgery in small working spaces, where rigid instruments and restrictive working angles act as barriers to safe dissection.

Thus, open surgery remains commonplace in paediatrics, particularly for complex major surgery and for surgical oncology.

Robotic surgical platforms have been designed to overcome the limitations of laparoscopic surgery by offering a stable 3-dimensional view, improved ergonomics and greater range of motion.

Such advantages may be particularly beneficial in paediatric surgery by empowering the surgeon to perform MIS in the smaller working spaces found in children, particularly in cases that may demand intracorporeal suturing and anastomosis.

However, some reservations have been raised regarding the utilisation of robotic platforms in children, including elevated cost, an increased operative time and a lack of dedicated paediatric equipment.

This article aims to review the current role of robotics within the field of paediatric surgery.

O’Brien, Lukas Padraig,Hannan, Enda,Antao, Brice,Peirce, Colin, 2023, Paediatric robotic surgery: a narrative review, Springer

Dokumentieren

Öffnen

Teilen

Quelle

Artikel empfohlen von ES/IODE AI

Lung cancer risk and exposure to air pollution: a multicenter North China case–control study involving 14604 subjects
lung cancer case–control air pollution never-smokers nomogram model controls lung-related 14604 subjects north polluted consistent smokers quit exposure lung cancer risk air people factor smoking pollution study history