Comparative analysis of two methods in circumcision: a new disposable device versus classic sleeve technique

Purpose Circumcision is the most common surgical procedures performed in males.

Medical circumcision is recommended for diseases such as phimosis, paraphimosis, balanoposthitis and common urinary tract infections, although there is no exact indication.

Conversely, Jewish and Muslim individuals commonly undergo circumcision regardless of medical necessity.

Circumcision devices are designed to shorten surgery time, achieve an aesthetic appearance and ensure safe surgery.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the NeoAlis clamp, a disposable circumcision device, by comparing it with the sleeve technique in children.

Materials and methods Between 2017 and 2023, retrospective evaluation of 2626 patients who underwent circumcision using either the NeoAlis clamp (group 1) or the sleeve technique (group 2) was conducted.

Operation time, results, cost, complications were compared between the two groups.

Results The study encompassed 2626 patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria.

Group 1 comprised 2403 patients, whereas Group 2 consisted of 223 patients.

The overall complication rate, as denoted by n  = 47, was 1.7%.

Group 1 operation time was shorter than group 2.

Bleeding, the most feared complication in the early period, was higher in the second group.

No statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups regarding cost comparison.

Conclusion The primary concern during circumcision is to avoid complications related to general anesthesia in newborns and infants.

The use of disposable ring devices has been facilitated by the shorter operation time and the absence of the need for sutures when performing circumcision under local anesthesia.

However, knowledge of advanced surgical circumcision techniques is necessary in cases of bleeding and inappropriate ring placement.