detalle del documento
IDENTIFICACIÓN

oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:9645...

Tema
Articles
Autor
Oztop, Nida Demir, Semra Toprak, Ilkim Deniz Unal, Derya Gelincik, Aslı
Langue
en
Editor

OceanSide Publications, Inc.

Categoría

Allergy and Asthma Proceedings

Año

2022

fecha de cotización

10/10/2023

Palabras clave
0 ± attack vaccination hae attacks doses covid-19
Métrico

Resumen

BACKGROUND: There are some adverse effects with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines, but the impact of COVID-19 vaccination on attacks in hereditary angioedema (HAE) is not well defined.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the influence of COVID-19 vaccination on the course of HAE.

METHOD: The COVID-19 vaccination status was determined in 140 adult patients with HAE.

The number and severity of attacks recorded from patients' diaries were evaluated at four different periods, comprising 1 month before the first dose, the period between the first and the second doses of COVID-19 vaccine in all the patients, the period between the second dose and the third doses in those who received three doses, and 1 month after the last vaccination dose.

The disease and attack severities were assessed with the disease severity score (DSS) and 10-point visual analog scale, respectively.

The patients were divided into two main groups as group 1 (those who had at least two doses of COVID-19 vaccines [n = 114]) and group 2 (those who had no vaccination [n = 26]).

Only Sinovac and Biontech, which were only approved in Turkey.

RESULTS: The mean ± standard deviation DSS was significantly higher in the patients who experienced an attack after vaccination within 48 hours (6.61 ± 1.88 versus 4.14 ± 1.69; p < 0.001).

Long-term prophylaxis was less common in the patients with an increased number of attacks (n = 5 (27.8%) versus n = 54 (56.3%); p = 0.027).

The number of patients with less than a high school education was higher in group 2 (n = 23 [88.5%]) than in group 1 (n = 26 [3.1%]) (p < 0.001).

The number of patients who had concerns about the triggering of a vaccine-induced HAE attack or about the possible vaccine adverse effects was higher in group 2 (n = 26 [100%]) than in group 1 (n = 74 [64.9%]).

CONCLUSION: It seems that COVID-19 vaccination does not increase HAE attacks regardless of the type of the vaccines.

We recommend that HAE activity should be under control before COVID-19 vaccination, and the patients should be well informed about the safety of the vaccines.

Oztop, Nida,Demir, Semra,Toprak, Ilkim Deniz,Unal, Derya,Gelincik, Aslı, 2022, Positive perception of COVID-19 vaccination in HAE: No significant impact of vaccination on disease course, OceanSide Publications, Inc.

Compartir

Fuente

Artículos recomendados por ES/IODE IA

Investigation of Heavy Metal Analysis on Medicinal Plants Used for the Treatment of Skin Cancer by Traditional Practitioners in Pretoria
heavy metals medicinal plants skin cancer icp-ms health risk assessment treatment cancer plants 0 metal health medicinal