detalle del documento
IDENTIFICACIÓN

oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:1108...

Tema
Original Research
Autor
Rath, Louise Yeh, Wei Zhen Roldan, Angie Wesselingh, Robb Zhong, Michael Tan, Tracie Seery, Nabil Bridge, Francesca Foong, YiChao Skibina, Olga Nesbitt, Cassie Butzkueven, Helmut Monif, Mastura van der Walt, Anneke
Langue
en
Editor

BMJ Publishing Group

Categoría

BMJ Neurology Open

Año

2024

fecha de cotización

11/6/2024

Palabras clave
pwnic eligible pwms assess received covid-19 tixagevimab/cilgavimab uptake
Métrico

Resumen

BACKGROUND: In Australia, tixagevimab/cilgavimab 150 mg/150 mg was a government-funded pre-exposure prophylaxis for COVID-19 people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) and other neuroimmunological conditions (pwNIc) treated with anti-CD20 antibodies or sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators were eligible.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the roll-out, uptake and real-world efficacy of tixagevimab/cilgavimab in the prevention and severity of COVID-19.

To assess compliance with uptake depending on the location of delivery.

METHODS: We undertook a single-centre study.

440 pwMS and pwNIc were eligible.

Logistic regression was used to assess predictors of COVID-19 during follow-up and to assess predictors of uptake among those who consented.

RESULTS: Of the eligible pwMS and pwNIc in our service, 52.7% (233/440) requested a consultation and were included in this study.

Consultation resulted in 71.7% of people (167/233) receiving the treatment.

Of these, 94.0% (157/167) had received three or more COVID-19 vaccines.

Among those who received a single dose of tixagevimab/cilgavimab, 19.16% (32/167) tested positive for COVID-19 during the observational window.

The majority of these were on ocrelizumab (68.8% (22/32)).

None of those with COVID-19 required hospitalisation or supplemental oxygen.

There was no difference in odds of COVID-19 during the observation period between those who received and did not receive tixagevimab/cilgavimab (adjusted OR, aOR 2.16 (95% CI 0.82 to 6.85), p=0.43).

Uptake of tixagevimab/cilgavimab was highest when offered at the hospital infusion centre (aOR 3.09 (95% CI 1.08 to 9.94) relative to referral to the local pharmacy, p=0.04).

CONCLUSION: Tixagevimab/cilgavimab administration did not protect against subsequent COVID-19 in our cohort.

Compliance with uptake was influenced by administration location.

Rath, Louise,Yeh, Wei Zhen,Roldan, Angie,Wesselingh, Robb,Zhong, Michael,Tan, Tracie,Seery, Nabil,Bridge, Francesca,Foong, YiChao,Skibina, Olga,Nesbitt, Cassie,Butzkueven, Helmut,Monif, Mastura,van der Walt, Anneke, 2024, Real-world efficacy, roll-out and uptake of intramuscular tixagevimab/cilgavimab as COVID-19 pre-exposure prophylaxis in people with multiple sclerosis and neuroimmunological conditions during the COVID-19 pandemic, BMJ Publishing Group

Compartir

Fuente

Artículos recomendados por ES/IODE IA

High-Frequency Repetitive Magnetic Stimulation at the Sacrum Alleviates Chronic Constipation in Parkinson’s Patients
magnetic stimulation parkinson’s significant patients scale sacrum pd hf-rms chronic constipation scores
The mechanism of PFK-1 in the occurrence and development of bladder cancer by regulating ZEB1 lactylation
bladder cancer pfk-1 zeb1 lactylation glycolysis inhibits lactate glucose bc pfk-1 cancer lactylation cells bladder