detalle del documento
IDENTIFICACIÓN

oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:1023...

Tema
Original Article
Autor
Chen, Jiani Wang, Huan Zhang, Chen Shi, Le Zhang, Qianqian Song, Xiaole Wang, Dehui Hu, Li Yu, Hongmeng Sun, Xicai
Langue
en
Editor

John Wiley and Sons Inc.

Categoría

Clinical and Translational Allergy

Año

2023

fecha de cotización

16/8/2024

Palabras clave
surgery sinus scores chronic polyps trials endoscopic rhinosinusitis ess dupilumab efficacy nasal
Métrico

Resumen

BACKGROUND: To compare the safety and efficacy between endoscopic sinus surgery and different biologics in treating chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps in adults by reviewing the existing clinical trials.

METHODS: Data extraction and risk of bias assessment were conducted by 2 independent reviewers according to the PRISMA recommendations and any disagreement was resolved by a third investigator.

Outcomes were measured through a random‐effects model.

We searched Embase, Web of Science, MEDLINE, Cochrane, and other relevant sources from its inception to April 30, 2022.

We included randomized controlled trials(RCTs) involving endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) or biologics in treating adult patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps.

Studies involving other miscellaneous diseases, non‐RCT design, and insufficient participants or follow‐up were excluded.

RESULTS: In this systematic review, five RCTs and 1748 patients were included.

All the biologics, as well as ESS, could significantly improve key nasal outcomes in CRSwNP both at 6 months and 1 year.

Dupilumab exhibited better efficacy than ESS in improving SNOT‐22 scores at one year.

However, ESS showed superiority over three biologics in improving nasal congestion scores (NCS) at two various time points, except for better efficacy of Dupilumab at 1 year.

For the loss of smell scores, a greater improvement was observed in the Dupilumab cohort compared with other biologics and even ESS counterparts.

Safety analysis showed no significant difference between the ESS cohort and biologic treatment.

CONCLUSIONS: In summary, ESS showed comparable improvement in quality of life and symptoms to Omalizumab, Mepolizumab, and Benralizumab.

Dupilumab seems to be more effective than ESS in selected items, whereas head‐to‐head trials and real‐world studies are urgent to compare their efficacy.

Our findings also showed that biologics could be applied as alternative or adjuvant therapy for uncontrolled severe CRSwNP.

Chen, Jiani,Wang, Huan,Zhang, Chen,Shi, Le,Zhang, Qianqian,Song, Xiaole,Wang, Dehui,Hu, Li,Yu, Hongmeng,Sun, Xicai, 2023, Comparative short‐term efficacy of endoscopic sinus surgery and biological therapies in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: A network meta‐analysis, John Wiley and Sons Inc.

Compartir

Fuente

Artículos recomendados por ES/IODE IA

Bone metastasis prediction in non-small-cell lung cancer: primary CT-based radiomics signature and clinical feature
non-small-cell lung cancer bone metastasis radiomics risk factor predict cohort model cect cancer prediction 0 metastasis radiomics clinical