Détail du document
Identifiant

doi:10.1007/s11606-024-08654-5...

Auteur
Kruse, Gina R. Percac-Lima, Sanja Barber-Dubois, Marjanna Davies, Madeline E. Gundersen, Daniel A. Ho, Oanh Mascioli, Lynette Munshi, Mehezbin Perry, Sarah Singh, Deepinder Thomas, Annette Emmons, Karen M. Haas, Jennifer S.
Langue
en
Editeur

Springer

Catégorie

Medicine & Public Health

Année

2024

Date de référencement

14/02/2024

Mots clés
colorectal cancer screening community health centers social determinants of health implementation science. compared centers social odds cancer prioritized crc bundling implementation fqhcs outreach
Métrique

Résumé

Background Bundling is combining individual interventions to meet quality metrics.

Bundling offers of cancer screening with screening for social determinants of health (SDOH) may enable health centers to assist patients with social risks and yield efficiencies.

Objective To measure effects of bundling fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) and SDOH screening in federally qualified health centers (FQHCs).

Design Clustered stepped-wedge trial.

Participants Four Massachusetts FQHCs randomized to implement bundled FIT-SDOH over 8-week “steps.”

Intervention Outreach to 50–75-year-olds overdue for CRC screening to offer FIT with SDOH screening.

The implementation strategy used facilitation and training for data monitoring and reporting.

Main Measures Implementation process descriptions, data from facilitation meetings, and CRC and SDOH screening rates.

Rates were compared between implementation and control FQHCs in each “step” by fitting generalized linear mixed-effects models with random intercepts for FQHCs, patients, and “step” by FQHC.

Key Results FQHCs tailored implementation processes to their infrastructure, workflows, and staffing and prioritized different groups for outreach.

Two FQHCs used population health outreach, and two integrated FIT-SDOH within established programs, such as pre-visit planning.

Of 34,588 patients overdue for CRC screening, 54% were female; 20% Black, 11% Latino, 10% Asian, and 47% white; 32% had Medicaid, 16% Medicare, 32% private insurance, and 11% uninsured.

Odds of CRC screening completion in implementation “steps” compared to controls were higher overall and among groups prioritized for outreach (overall: adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.41, p  = 0.005; prioritized: aOR 2.88, p  = 0.002).

Odds of SDOH screening did not differ across “steps.”

Conclusions As healthcare systems are required to conduct more screenings, it is notable that outreach for a long-standing cancer screening requirement increased screening, even when bundled with a newer screening requirement.

This outreach was feasible in a real-world safety-net clinical population and may conserve resources, especially compared to more complex or intensive outreach strategies.

Clinical Trials Registration NCT04585919

Kruse, Gina R.,Percac-Lima, Sanja,Barber-Dubois, Marjanna,Davies, Madeline E.,Gundersen, Daniel A.,Ho, Oanh,Mascioli, Lynette,Munshi, Mehezbin,Perry, Sarah,Singh, Deepinder,Thomas, Annette,Emmons, Karen M.,Haas, Jennifer S., 2024, Bundling Colorectal Cancer Screening Outreach with Screening for Social Risk in Federally Qualified Health Centers: A Stepped-Wedge Implementation-Effectiveness Study, Springer

Document

Ouvrir

Partager

Source

Articles recommandés par ES/IODE IA

Diabetes and obesity: the role of stress in the development of cancer
stress diabetes mellitus obesity cancer non-communicable chronic disease stress diabetes obesity patients cause cancer