Détail du document
Identifiant

oai:arXiv.org:2412.03416

Sujet
Astrophysics - Earth and Planetary...
Auteur
Kanodia, Shubham
Catégorie

sciences : astrophysique

Année

2024

Date de référencement

11/12/2024

Mots clés
jupiters m-dwarf mass
Métrique

Résumé

This paper presents a comparative analysis of the bulk properties (mass and radius) of transiting giant planets ($\gtrsim$ 8$R_{\oplus}$) orbiting FGKM stars.

Our findings suggest that the average mass of M-dwarf Jupiters is lower than that of their solar-type counterparts, primarily due to the scarcity of super-Jupiters ( $\gtrsim$ 2 $M_J$) around M-dwarfs.

However, when super-Jupiters are excluded from the analysis, we observe a striking similarity in the average masses of M-dwarf and FGK warm-Jupiters.

We propose that these trends can be explained by a minimum disk dust mass threshold required for Jovian formation through core accretion, which is likely to be satisfied more often around higher mass stars.

This simplistic explanation suggests that the disk mass has more of an influence on giant planet formation than other factors such as the host star mass, formation location, metallicity, radiation environment, etc., and also accounts for the lower occurrence of giant planets around M-dwarf stars.

Additionally, we explore the possibility of an abrupt transition in the ratio of super-Jupiters to Jupiters around F-type stars at the Kraft break, which could be a product of $v$sin$i$ related detection biases, but requires additional data from an unbiased sample with published non-detections to confirm.

Overall, our results provide valuable insights into the formation and evolution of giant exoplanets across a diverse range of stellar environments.

;Comment: 12 pages, 8 figures.

Accepted for publication in ApJ

Kanodia, Shubham, 2024, Transiting Jupiters around M-dwarfs have similar masses to FGK warm-Jupiters

Document

Ouvrir

Partager

Source

Articles recommandés par ES/IODE IA

Diagnostic reliability of chest CT qualitative and quantitative assessment to predict survival and morbidity in oncology patients with COVID-19 infection
covid-19 chest ct oncology patients cancer status pulmonary analysis versus cancer infection patients covid-19 oncology using ct chest statistically tss